search
First Reviews Of The Latest 'Outlander': Watch Or Skip?
Series / Reviews

First Reviews Of The Latest 'Outlander': Watch Or Skip?

The initial reviews for 'Outlander: Blood of My Blood' are largely positive, highlighting its engaging story and strong production values.

With Matthew B. Roberts at the helm, also known for Outlander, the beloved universe returns with a new prequel set in the 18th century. The series debuted last week on the streaming service Starz, titled Outlander: Blood of My Blood, and has received strong reception once again.

The series follows the story of Jamie Fraser's parents and Ellen MacKenzie, exploring their forbidden romance during the turbulent times of the Jacobite uprisings. Caitríona Balfe asserts that the production remains faithful to the tone of the source material. As of now, the series boasts a Tomatometer score of 92% on Rotten Tomatoes from thirteen reviews.

Fan Service
Aramide Tinubu from Variety describes the prequel as "lush, complex, beautifully shot, and structured," calling it an exciting addition to a series that has captivated many viewers since its inception. Marah Eakin from TheWrap emphasizes that the series "clearly delights in delivering Outlander fan service," noting that many familiar elements are returning.

Gemma Wilson from Seattle Times states in her review that "no one would turn down a second helping of such a decadent treat, especially when it is made with so much love for the original."

Blood and Thunder
Verne Gay from Newsday calls the production "full of wild plot twists, engaging lead roles, and stunning landscapes," questioning what there wouldn't be to enjoy.



Ed Power from Independent (UK) is more critical, stating that "the series is rife with the Scottish equivalent of blarney." He argues this results in a production full of blood and thunder, which sometimes devolves into unintentional comedy. However, he seems to be the only one not enjoying the latest Outlander.

Recommended articles