Series / Reviews
Netflix's 'The Abandons' Is Being Demolished
The new Netflix series 'The Abandons' receives mixed reviews: clearly no 'Yellowstone'. This series leaves much to be desired.
For the past few days, a new western series has been available on Netflix. It's called The Abandons, a show undoubtedly created after Yellowstone proved to be a massive success. Unfortunately, after harsh criticism from reviewers, little remains of the series.
The Abandons, currently sitting at only 24 percent, revolves around two rival families in the lawless West. Matriarchs clash over land and power in Oregon during the 1850s.
Roxana Hadadi of Vulture criticizes the series for lacking simple viewing pleasure: "For those seeking entertainment, the series makes it all too easy to tune out." Her verdict aligns with the low Tomatometer score.
According to Hunter Ingram of TheWrap, the production struggles mainly with itself: "The biggest issue is a frustrating urge to overcomplicate its own vision." This results in an erratic course and a less sharp storyline.
Robert Lloyd of the Los Angeles Times praises some set pieces but remains reserved: "The series is busy and often violent, with a few impressive scenes, but outside of the majestic Canadian nature, everything feels artificial and schematic." He is not convinced by its tone and form.
John Anderson (Wall Street Journal) questions the dialogue: "People may have spoken like this once, but probably only from the pulpit in church." The language feels solemn and theatrical to him rather than natural.
There is also another perspective. Rebecca Nicholson (Financial Times) gave it 3/5 and writes: "Despite everything, it’s creepily addictive. It’s like shamelessly watching a soap opera." For her, the series remains captivating despite its flaws.
The Abandons, currently sitting at only 24 percent, revolves around two rival families in the lawless West. Matriarchs clash over land and power in Oregon during the 1850s.
Easy To Tune Out
Roxana Hadadi of Vulture criticizes the series for lacking simple viewing pleasure: "For those seeking entertainment, the series makes it all too easy to tune out." Her verdict aligns with the low Tomatometer score.
Related news
According to Hunter Ingram of TheWrap, the production struggles mainly with itself: "The biggest issue is a frustrating urge to overcomplicate its own vision." This results in an erratic course and a less sharp storyline.
Artificial Framework
Robert Lloyd of the Los Angeles Times praises some set pieces but remains reserved: "The series is busy and often violent, with a few impressive scenes, but outside of the majestic Canadian nature, everything feels artificial and schematic." He is not convinced by its tone and form.
John Anderson (Wall Street Journal) questions the dialogue: "People may have spoken like this once, but probably only from the pulpit in church." The language feels solemn and theatrical to him rather than natural.
Creepily Addictive
There is also another perspective. Rebecca Nicholson (Financial Times) gave it 3/5 and writes: "Despite everything, it’s creepily addictive. It’s like shamelessly watching a soap opera." For her, the series remains captivating despite its flaws.
